Ben Elton Interview – Worth A Quick Look

A friend of mine showed me a 7 minute interview on YouTube of the author and satirist Ben Elton.  As an Objectivist I would have to totally agree with everything he says (apart from an incorrect use of the word “sacrifice”), and Elton manages to cram in such an intelligent and insightful critique of today’s fame-obsessed irrational faith-ridden feelings-motivated culture, into such a short time.

Although Elton is not an Objectivist, he basically identifies the dichotomy between reason and emotionalism.  Ultimately, there can be only one guide in our lives: either we use our faculty of reason (rationality) to integrate facts that we apprehend from reality using our percepts (sense experience), using a method of non-contradictory identity (logic), OR we let our feelings guide us.  Our feelings are the END result of a thought or action – they can be trained by our rational conscious mind, but our feelings are not a prescription of reality, because no act of will or emotion can ever change reality.  That is why Ayn Rand successful identified existence as always having primacy over consciousness, because our minds must conform to reality, not the other way around.  Those who live with emotionalism (of which faith is a variety) as their guide disregard this most fundamental metaphysical axiom and basically ask that reality change to meet their will.

Here is the video.  It’s only short so it’s worth a few minutes to have a watch:


2 Responses to “Ben Elton Interview – Worth A Quick Look”

  1. crabsallover Says:

    I highly recommend Ben Eltons’ book ‘Blind Faith’. It is witty and profound. The sub-story of the ‘Secret Company of Humanists’ who have one of the few remaining libraries about science and literature – is quite chilling.

  2. Valda Redfern Says:

    Yesterday I heard Ben Elton on Radio 4 (I think it was an audio clip from a TV interview with David Frost). Elton advocated legalising drugs, giving as one reason the fact that prohibition helped no one apart from criminal gangs. He sounded like an intelligent man who had considered the evidence and done his own thinking.

    A while ago I heard an interview with the novelist Martin Amis about the threat from Islamism and he too came across as an honest man who tried to base his conclusions on facts.

    I’m not a fan of either of these two as entertainers, but they are worth listening to, and I hope their willingness to contradict the orthodoxy is the start of a trend.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: